45cat Logo
 Welcome Guest
 Login  :  Join 45cat   

Record Details

Artist:The Supremes
Label:  Tamla Motown
Catalogue:TMG 501
Date:19 Mar 1965
Chart Position:7
Collection:  I Own It     I Want It 
Community:70 Own
» Search on eBay  » Search on Amazon
♫ Listen To This Record ♫

AThe SupremesStop! In The Name Of LoveHolland, Dozier, HollandHolland, Dozier9.3  Rate
BThe SupremesI'm In Love AgainHolland, Dozier, HollandHolland, Dozier8.0  Rate


Melody Maker review Mar 13, 1965.
NME review Mar 19, 1965.
Record Mirror review Mar 20, 1965.


[ +4 more ]

2nd Dec 2014
 Michael E. Sorry only on the Christmas Collection Album, Will You find "My Favourite Things". H.

Charlie Chalk
2nd Dec 2014
 It's possible that My Favourite Things was issued as a single in Singapore!

Neil Forbes
2nd Dec 2014
 To Michael Earith, I think the track you want might only be found as an item on LP. I doubt that EMI would've issued that track as a single, even as a B-side filler.

Michael Earith
2nd Dec 2014
 Can Anyone Out There Give Any Information About As To Whether There Was A UK Market
7" Issue Of The Supremes Cover Of MY FAVOURITE THINGS?
Which To Me Sounds Quite Good.

23rd Sep 2014
 RD, I don't think you listened to the video I posted earlier, which was in stereo, as you then included a link to a copy that you own, a reissue in stereo.

Let's not forget that Motown recorded on an eight track machine in 1965, so that all the vocals, instruments, and dubbed additions could be added to a final eight track master, which was then mixed down to stereo for LPs in stereo, and a mono mix down for singles and LPs in mono.

I love mono, but the mono cut you posted is just a mess, and the separation on the stereo mix is far preferable to my ears.....

Sixties pop singles were mixed loud in mono so that they had maximum sound appeal for listening to on portable Japanese transistor radios played on AM (or Medium Wave in UK) stations, so any nuances of finesse went whooosh!! straight out the window.

The stereo cut was nearly always preferable and showed the finesse that some producers got out of their respective artists.

This track has discernible vocals + backup vocals + drums + bass guitar + Hammond organ + vibraphone + tambourine + saxophone + trombone + trumpet + maybe other instruments.

A Farfisa organ is in there as well I believe, but I cannot hear a rhythm guitar.

The saxophones (tenor and bass), as well as the trombones are multi-tracked, by "Bouncing" the instrument sound between tracks to sound like extra musicians playing, a device often used by the likes of Brian Wilson of The Beach Boys et cetera.

Quote: "......Before all tracks are filled, any number of existing tracks can be "bounced" into one or two tracks, and the original tracks erased, making more room for more tracks to be reused for fresh recording. in 1963 The Beatles were using twin track for Please Please Me album. Beatles producer George Martin used this technique extensively to achieve multiple track results, while still being limited to using only multiple four-track machines, until an eight-track machine became available during the recording of the Beatles' White Album. The Beach Boys' Pet Sounds also made innovative use of multitracking with 8-track machines of the day (circa 1965). Motown also began recording with 8-track machines in 1965 before moving to 16-track machines in mid-1969......"

22nd Sep 2014
 But as we know, on this single, the vibraphone and the drums appear in both channels. If you want the stereo version on a 45, find this single


Here's the original 45 mix


22nd Sep 2014
 Stop! In The Name Of Love - stereo cut

...from the sliding Hammond organ intro, and that brass figure, you know you are in for a r-i-d-e......
The girls lay it out, with Diana's oh so sincere vocal delivery, heartbreaking in parts, over the plain but effective bass line, and brass fills...pure magic.
Flo and Mary warble angelically in back very effectively.

The killer for me is the "ding, ding" of the vibraphone out of left channel with sustain, while the metronomic drumming out of the right channel drives the whole song forward, and multi tracked saxophones add the right amount of brouhaha to proceedings.....

"....Baby, think it over......think it over, Baby, Ooooh..."
Such a lovely sentiment, just like Olive Oyls repost to Popeye "....you're awful Pretty... you're pretty Awful yourself......."

19th Feb 2014
 Generously, your hard-earned money bought you another HDH composition on the 'B' ("I'm In Love Again") - and it's not half bad, either.

Now that Diana's register has been lowered from that of the piercing Primettes, its sensuousness - and that was the magic ingredient of The Supremes - is displayed even more evidently on this number than on the hit side.


26th Oct 2012
 what a single to release to launch the tamla motown label! when the beatles heard it, they went to george martin and his/emi's engineers, and demanded that their singles be "cut as loud" (as that opening shout of "stop!") - so thenceforth, they (some of them) were.

19th Feb 2011
 ....Baby, think it over......think it over, Baby, Ooooh

....did Di, Flo and Mary ever have a finer moment on record?.....

  Please login or join 45cat to add your comment about this record.

Linked Releases

USA - Motown - 1965

Australia - Stateside - 1965

Canada - Tamla - 1965

Germany - CBS - 1965

Japan - Motown - 1965

Netherlands - Tamla Motown - 1965

This Record:  Add to List  :  Add Image  :  Edit Images  :  Add Missing Info  :  Make Correction  :  Add Linked Release  :  View Image Data  :  Credits  :  BBCode  :   
45cat is part of 45worlds.com  :  Live Music  :  Vinyl Albums  :  78 RPM  :  CD Albums  :  Magazine  :  CD Singles  :  12" Singles  :  Tape Media  :  Music Memorabilia  :  Classical Music
45cat website ©2015  :  Help Page  :  Privacy Policy  :  Terms  :  Contact Us  :  Like us on Facebook  :